Cognitive and Emotional Intelligence paper sample Essay

DECLARATIONI control that this assessment is my own work, based on my own personalised research/study . I also decl are that this assessment, nor parts of it, has non been previously submitted for any separate unit/ mental faculty or course, and that I entertain non copied in part or firm or otherwise plagiarised the work of another schoolchild and/or persons. I fo chthonic read the ACAP Student Plagiarism and academician Misconduct Policy and understand its implications. I also declare, if this is a functional skills assessment, that a Client/Interviewee Consent Form has been read and signed by two parties, and where applicable parental consent has been obtained.Organisational Behaviour estimate 1Two meaning(a) differences in organisational behaviour are cognitive wisdom and stirred light. The fol commencementing essay evaluates theoretical and functional strengths and limitations of both comprehensions and discusses the applications programme of each in moderne organisations. Modern organisations face differing ch allenges to those of the previous century, elevated turn-over, globalization and the rapid development of ever changing technology all require special attention. It has never been much important to find the safe person for the skillful job. full general mental big businessman does not channel the all picture. There is a cerebrate between cognitive and turned on(p) intelligence, each world important contributors to modern organisations.Cognitive intelligence (CI) has traditionally been the indicator of successful job performance (Bosco, Nathan, & vitamin A Allen, 2012). Organisational psychology uses cognitive ability to predict workplace success (Neisser et al., 1996). Cognitive intelligence female genitals be generally defined as academic ability, IQ or general mental ability, including the ability to critically think and reason logical systemally, to examine and problem cultivate, as well as individual aptitud e in reading and writing (Sternberg, 2006). CI is a expensive asset in employees, particularly in both(prenominal) specialist fields where critical thinking, logic and reason are required, occupations such as scientific researchers, accountants, economists etc. The susceptibility of all workers to engage cognitive intelligence in quick and rough-and-ready decision making serves as an important basis for achieving successful outcomes in the most workplaces. Patton (2003) found a consequence of the developing business climate is the global economy and the Internet, each necessitating an increased speed of communications in business transactions. Decisive leading are forced to make well- seasond decisions without consult and all the data on hand, such an environment necessitates in the need for extravagantlyer takes of general mental ability in beau monde to achieve both increased levels and blistering acquisition of job knowledge, so leading to greater levels of job perf ormance (Schmidt & deoxyadenosine monophosphate Hunter, 2004). CEO of southwesterlyOrganisational BehaviourAssessment 1Airlines, James Patton, displayed the importance of quick and useful decision making when facing a crisis on September 11, 2001. When planes where grounded and millions of passengers stranded, Patton decided that customers and staff would come first. No employees were required to stand down or take pay cuts, and passengers were given hassle free refunds, furthermore, Southwest employees were further to take passengers to a movie or bowling to pass the time while awaiting virgins. In the aftermath of 9/11, while most airlines were cut down their workforces by 20% Southwest announced a $179.8 million get ahead sharing program for employees and managed to retain all staff (Gittell et el, 2006). Other representatives of CI are literacy skills, such as reading and writing which are major tools of modern day businesses emails, documents and various other item of paperwork require proud levels of accuracy for effective communication, efficiency on computers and an ability to learn new technology is important in this information world. McKenney, Copeland, Copeland and Mason (1995) propose that the transformation in communications and information technology should be considered as a dominant force in recent hearty and economic change. Although CI is undeniably important in establishing an efficient workforce it is not the full-length picture.The value of cognitive intelligence is irrefutable however just about limitations apply. Validities of predicting outcomes in real life are low. According to Viswevaran and Ones (2002), general mental ability accounts for except 25% variance in work performance. Furthermore, they raise that wakeless behaviour is more than just the result of what intelligence tests criterion. A practical ex adenylic acidle of the limitations of cognitive intelligence keister be referred back to the other airli nes effected by the 9/11 crisis. While Southwest airlines triumphed against antagonist other airlines suffered greatly. There is no denying that the CEOs of these struggling airlines were raft of elevated cognitive intelligence, however, this personal asset alone was not luxuriant to avoid financial losses, perhaps other ingredients such as emotional intelligence and adequate policies are still required in parliamentary procedure to retain consumer trust. Other CI limitations include measurement, particularly IQ test which whitethorn result in adverse impact against minorities (Viswesvaran & adenylic acid Ones, 2002).Tests presented in a vocabulary other than an individuals primary language as well as differing cultural approaches make the result of such tests weighted in favour of the culture that produced it. High IQ does not assure adequate function in the workplace. Highly gifted plenty are often underestimated and misunderstood by peers and society (Nauta & amp Corten, 2002). They may make ineffective leaders as staff may not appreciate their intensity, perfectionism, questioning, and macrocosm too smart Heylighten (n.d.). Furthermore, CI does not guarantee a good team player. Elkin and Burke (2008) report Steve dividing lines, while an example of a successful individual with extremely high cognitive intelligence, is reputed to have been a tyrant to work for. Critics claim he took credit for fancys that were not his, was not a team player, and was impatient, domineering and obsessive, behaviour which is inducing of high staff turnover or low employee retention rates.They also suggest Jobs strengths such as vision, magnetic charisma, perfectionism, all drove him to be a great CEO but are also the same drives that place his community, staff and investors at risk. Highly intelligent individuals may have issues with delegation, trust, admitting fallacy or asking for help. When compared to autonomous work, good teamwork enables tasks to be accomplished faster and more efficiently, reduces workloads, work pressure and improves staff relations (Kelly, 2004). Some super intelligent people, such as those with Aspergers Syndrome, may have low social skills. Individuals with Aspergers may test very highly on a CI tests but often their communication with others is blunt, awkward, stilted or unique (Shea, 2009). Saaty (1999) suggests that primary language expresses affections rather than ideas or thoughts. An inability to effectively go with consumers may result in difficult social relationships. While CI is indeed an important consideration in employee ability it is not a stand-alone measure of success. aflame Intelligence (EI) is increasingly being viewed as having a significant influence on job performance and effective leadership in the workforce. A unwashedly referred to definition of EI was given by Mayer, Caruso and Salovey (1999) Emotional intelligence refers to an ability to recognise the meanings of emoti ons and their relationships and to reason and problem solve on the basis of them. Emotional intelligence is involved in the content to perceive emotions, assimilate emotion-related feelings, understand the information of those emotions and manage them (p. 267). EI reflects ones capacity to cope with daily challenges and may assist in predicting both personal and professional success in life. Assets in any on the job(p) relationship include social awareness, social networking, relationship charge, self-awareness and self- solicitude. While bantam business has long relied on understanding the importance of social networking and tutelage healthy relationships and arrogant reputation in their community, new technology, globalization and social media now take social awareness and social networking to a whole new level.According to Qualman (2009) global connectivity now results in both corroborative and negative messages regarding products and services becoming immediately, permanen tly and easily accessible to the whole world. EI is a valuable asset in employees, particularly in some specialist fields where charisma and empathy are required, such as, sales and marketing, counsellor or nursing. efficacious leaders, as part of their role in managing relationships, should comprise competent levels of watch over, empathy, courtesy, motivation and be able to inspire others. The importance of empathy can be illustrated by an American business called Toro who manufacture commercial lawn equipment. The temperament of the product results in around 100 serious injuries annually, prior to the troth of CEO Ken Melrose, Toro faced an average of 50 law suits per year, resulting in massive financial losses to the company. However, Melrose added empathy. Injured workers and their families where meet by company representatives, sympathies where expressed, investigations made and any needs were meet at the onset.This change in policy has reduced the number of lawsuits fro m an average of 50 per year to only one since 1991 when the policy was introduced (Rainey, Chan & Begin, 2008). Furthermore, leaders need teams who are energetic, innovative, germinal and passionate (Sloane, 2007). Understanding individual drives and motivations enables anxiety to get the best results from their team. Effective management must be self-aware and have the ability to self-manage, including being aware of and managing moods, adapt appropriate emotions and behaviours to appropriate situations. Jack Welsh, Chairman of General Electric states that A leaders intelligence must have a strong emotional component. He has to have high levels of self-awareness, matureness and self-control. (as cited in Balakrishanan & Mouli, 2011, p. 44). EI allows managers to get the best out of their employees. Perks (2007) advises that successful leaders are high in emotional intelligence they maintain positive working relationships and employ adequate coping strategies in all areas of life. Leaders, ideally, should be in possession of emotional intelligence to encourage the best of their team.Emotional intelligence, however, has its limitations. Cherniss (2010) even suggests that EI has produced the highest level of controversy in the social sciences of recent years. More clarity in regard to theory is required. Roberts, Matthews and Zeinder (2010) propose that EI models do not adequately lead theory. Furthermore, Roberts suggests that emotional intelligence definitions lack clarity and questions the criterion of which qualities should belong under the banner of emotional intelligence. It seems necessary to adopt one clear common definition. Measures of EI are currently underdeveloped in this relatively new field, more research and the creation of better measures may improve construct hardihood (Cherniss, 2010). This may result in the development of greater understanding and respect for the field. There is no guarantee that a person high in EI, will use th is asset in a positive manner. Individuals with high emotional intelligence may manipulate people or situations for personal gain. Saaty (2001) suggests that decisions are not always based on the greatest idea but on a persons ability to conduct others to accept the idea. More exploration and clarification is required to address some of the limitations of emotional intelligence.Modern organisations face fundamentally different problems from those of the in the past, globalization, increases in technology and staff turnover are just some of the issues being confronted. The belief has been held for around a century that higher(prenominal) intelligence in individuals is more valued due to their higher task performance (Viswesvaran & Ones, 2002). Modern organisations provide services, and are organised according to a ruffle of individuals, information and communication technology, social capital and recognized talents (Schoemaker & Jonkers, 2005). The measuring of CI enables modern organisations an affordable and speedy way of evaluating an employees general mental ability. General mental ability has been related to occupational level on both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (Schmidt & Hunter, 2004). CI measures allow employers to apply specific cognitive abilities to valid and appropriate positions within the business with a view to discovering the best person for the job. According to Holloway (2003) employing the right person for the job or job twin is more inborn now than ever.Job fit can be described as the degree to which a persons cognitive abilities, interests and personality dynamics fit those required for the job (Russell, 2003, p.27). This is where the importance of emotional intelligences comes into play. A never-ending balance between understanding the individual drives and motivations of workers and ensuring staff remain engaged, evangelistic and valued has many rewards for modern organisations. Incorporating a balance bet ween both intelligences gives employees the greatest chance of achieving appropriate job fit. Holloway (2003) states that positive job fit, results in increased job satisfaction, increased productivity and reduced staff turnover. Furthermore, research by OReilly, Chatman and Caldwell (1991) suggests newly hired staff whose with values that fit in with the culture of the organisation tend to adjust quicker, remain hourlong with the company and are overall more satisfied. While Hollaway, (2003) states that understanding of workers in regards to work/life balance, personal goals and drives may encourage loyalty step-down turnover, saving on retraining and downtime. Furthermore, EI combined with CI addresses the gaps between management and workers by dint of understanding of positive leading by example management that can result in emulation by employees resulting in a ripple effect throughout the organisation. There is a strong link between emotional intelligence and cognitive i ntelligence and the combination of both intelligences has become necessary for successful business relations in modern organisations.Cognitive intelligence and emotional intelligence are each important factors in regard to individual differences in the field of organisational behaviour in modern organisations. While general mental ability accounts for many valuable employee assets such as efficiencies in regard to knowledge acquisition and technical aptitude, limitations to rigorousness and measurement of testing and relevance mean that cognitive intelligence is not the only measure of a successful employee. Emotional intelligence also plays a key role in individual success in modern organisations. Effective leadership, self- awareness, social networking, empathy, self-management are all are assets of the emotionally intelligent. Modern organisations benefit from the combination of both intelligences by purpose the best fit for the position resulting in higher job satisfaction, hi gher retention of staff and greater profits.ReferencesBalakrishanan, L., & Mouli, S. (2011). Emotional Intelligence A Key for Effective Employee Management. Amet ledger of Management,1(1),44. Retrieved from http//www.ametjournal.com/attachment/Amet-journal.pdfBosco, F. A., Nathan, B., & Allen, D. G. (2012, July). Higher validity and less adverse impact Using Executive Attention to measure cognitive ability. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Personnel Assessment Council, Las Vegas, NV. Cherniss, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence Toward clarification of a concept. Industrial and organizational Psychology, 3(2), 110-126. inside10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01231.x Elkind, P., & Burke, D. (2008). The trouble with Steve. Fortune, 157, 54-63. Retrieved from http//personal.bellevuecollege.edu/llum/GBUS101/09WSteveJobs.pdf Gittell, J. H., Cameron, K., Lim, S., & Rivas, V. (2006). Relationships, layoffs, and organisational resilience airline constancy responses t o September 11. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(3), 300-329. inside10.1177/0021886306286466Heylighen, F. (n.d.). Gifted pile and their Problems. Retrieved from http//pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/GiftedProblems.pdfHiggins, D. M., Peterson, J. B., Pihl, R. O., & Lee, A. G. (2007). Prefrontal cognitive ability, intelligence, Big Five personality, and the prevision of advanced academic and workplace performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(2), 298. inside10.1037/00223514.93.2.298 Holloway, P. (2003). Job Fitness Series The Right Person for the Job. AboutPeople. Retrieved from http//www.aboutpeople.com/PDFFiles/The%20Right%20Person%20For%20the%20Job.pdfKelly, B., (2014). Importance of Teamwork in Organizations, Demand Media retrieved March 8, 2014. Retrieved from http//everydaylife.globalpost.com/importance-teamworkorganizations-12033.html McKenney, J. L., Copeland, D. C., Copeland, D. G., & Mason, R. O. (1995).Waves of change Business evolution thr ough information technology. Harvard Business Press. Boston, USA. doi 10.1080/08109029608632025Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27(4), 267-298. doi10.1016/s0160-2896(99)00016-1 Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities Emotional intelligence. Annual Review Psychology, 59(1), 507-536.doi10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646Nauta, N. & Corten, F. (2002) Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde Journal for Occupational and Insurance Physicians, 10(11), 332-335. doi10.1007/12498.1876-5858 Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard Jr, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence Knowns and unknowns. American psychologist, 51(2), 77. doi10.1037/0003-066x.51.2.77OReilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture A profile comparison approach to assessing person-orga nization fit. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 487-516. doi 10.2307/256404Patton, J. R. (2003). Intuition in decisions. Management purpose, 41(10), 989-996. doi10.1108/00251740310509517Perks, J. (2007, September). The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Business. Computer Weekly.com retrieved from http//www.computerweekly.com/news/2240082956/The-role-of-emotionalintelligence-in-business Qualman, E. (2009). Socialnomics How Social Media Transforms the Way we stand firm and do Business. Hoboken, USA. John Wiley & Sons. doi10.5860/CHOICE.48-1576Rainey, M. B., Chan, K., & Begin, J. (2008). Characterized by expiation Heres how business can use apology to dust litigation. Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, 26(7), 131-134. doi 10.1002/alt.20237Roberts, R. D., Matthews, G., & Zeinder, M. (2010). Emotional Intelligence Muddling through with(predicate) Theory and Measurement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 140-144. doi 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01214.xR ussell, C. (2003). Right Person, Right Job Guess or KnowThe Breakthrough Technologies of Performance Information, (2nd ed.). Amherst, USA. HRD Press Inc. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making for Leaders the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World (2nd ed.). Pittsburgh, USA. RWS publications. doi 10.1080/00137918308967693Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General Mental mightiness in the World of Work Occupational Attainment and Job Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 162173. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162 Schoemaker, M., & Jonker, J. (2005). Managing Intangible Assets An Essay on Organising Contemporary Organisations Based upon Identity, Competencies and Networks. Journal of Management Development, 24(6), 506-518. doi 10.1108/02621710510600964Shea, S.(2009). Capstone communications Difficulties Among Individuals With and Without Aspergers Syndrome. Retrieved fromhttp//www.asdjobsink.com/CommunicationDifficulties.pdfSloane, P . (2007). The Innovative Leader How to Inspire Your Team and Drive Creativity. Philadelphia, USA. Kogan Page Publishers. Retrieved fromhttp//books.google.com.au/books?id=fb1vXOzjIBYC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge _summary_r&cad=0v=onepage&q&f=falseSternberg, R. J. 2006. Intelligence. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. doi 10.1002/0470018860.s00555Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D. S. (2002). Agreements and Disagreements on the Role of General Mental Ability (GMA) in Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology. Human Performance, 15(1/2), 211-231. doi10.1207/s15327043hup1501&02_13