The Punishment Of Murder In The Uk Criminology Essay

The penalization Of gain In The Uk Criminology EssayA nuisance specifies that at that place be incessantly changing ideas, perceptions, and conceptions regarding what constitutes evil behaviour. The topic that is a constant regale to the United Kingdom is what generates a take to form, what kind of res publica be liable to perform these illegitimate acts and moreover oppositewise characteristics that whitethorn be the former of the iniquity. Theses be the questions that the UK is prompt with at the mo handst and t hot unsettled at these through a criminologist potential we shall reveal what are the characteristics of guilty crime of clear up and furthermore the if expectant penalisation that should be indulged upon a execution.Murder is defined as The unlawful cleanup position of well-nigh other human cosmos under the queens peace with malice forethought1. This definition provides an savvy of what the law conveys of bump off and furthermore shows t hat a person needs to subscribe intention of grantting murder. But the loose that constitutes is what makes a manslayer to blame reddened and unlawful acts.A criminologist would state that the background of the manslayers comprise in a murder violent expiry, scarcely there is mainly a combination of movers that economic aid perform these unlawful acts and they are biological, psychological, social, and economic. A criminologist would state that a spurn class root word or an lower class individual at the age of 16 20 tend to commit murders exposestanding to the m hotshottary or the social backgrounds and confederation they perpetrate in but come to the fores are taken into account for mandate is the background reasons that build up unlawful acts of a murderer are a progeny in a combination of provoke, jealously, revenge, pride or greed. But furthermore some murderers of a lower class mandate are a desire for control, revenge, and power. ofttimes these concomita ntors when endorse is a potential of criminal activities of an individual. A criminologist would state that an internalisation of these factors is behind a person who has the mens rea in committing a crime. Also a murderer shall be classed in accordance to the manner of how the murder was performed and inflicted upon a nonher human creationness.The categorical area a murderer is put into is a resultant orca, mound murder and spree killer. A serial killer is defined as individuals who guide a history of multiple killing of victims who were usually unknown to them earlierhand. Their crimes are affiliated as a result of a pressure that consistently has roots in the killers a serial killer tends to commit a murder crime in iodin location and it was give tongue to by Holmes and De Burger2.3Whereas a mass murderer commits murder of multiple numbers of muckle, this may be performed by a one person or a group of stack.4The last form of murder killing is spree killing, spree ki lling is state as a killing of cardinal or more killing and commit murder in more that one location unthe wishs of serial killing and furthermore there is no break surrounded by the murders.5A murderer tends to commit crimes against a certain individuals for purposeful reasons.The types of people a murderer would tar veritableise to victimisation of murder are pensioners for valuable items, it is mainly a sociological reason being property and the reason they may be murdered as they fanny non be seen as struggle back for they feeling. A lowers class person surrounded by an age group of 16-20 year old are samely to commit crimes and are mixed-up to getting murdered depending on the crimes they are committing and babies are a constant treat as the current British official statistics on babies changeableness increasing from a total of 15% in the catch of 2008 and 20096. This shows that babies are targeted as vulnerable victims. Furthermore The British crime statistics show that homicide has been at a high but is dramatically dropping, through out the period of that 2000-2009. The official statistics illustrates the encrypts decreasing from 1,047 to 615 homicides this shows that most murders gather in decreased but the factor that needs to be taken into account is that capital penalizations were at a high destruction ratio within that period and the punishments of death penalties have changed dramatically as there are more helping everyday bodies providing support towards the police stopping a crime of murder before it transpires. Looking at the homicide statistics of crime it is categorised into manslaughter, murder and infanticide, so this does not provide an understanding on how murders tend to be committed without the two categories and does not distinguish how much murders are happening each year. The other factor that is raised from the statistics state that men are mainly being killed at a high level that women as the character of men bei ng killed for homicide is 39 % whereas female victims homicide are at a percentage of 11%7. This illustrates that men are more likely to be killed than women regarding to murder. virtually theorist would state that the results of these deaths come from sociological, biological functionalism theories. The history of theories helps distinguish what is the causation of crime and furthermore the performance of crime.The possible action of functionalism is a theoretical scene of sociology. Sociology examines the situations in which people live and how these situations affect them. Some writers may state that the bureau a person lives should not affect the means a person reacts towards a high crime of murder. Sociology examines the question of why the reality is the way that it is.Functionalism bets at party through a functional material which stresses on everything the functionalism method is an objective social world with similarity amongst the individual human being and soci ety. Functionalisms look at the positivity of the society and always see the good in everything8. Some theorist may look at the point at looking at society as a positive way, this quote may not entertain peoples views towards positivity depending on what problematic issues people have been through in the past and furthermore people may not like the way society as treated an individual.The biological positivist looks at the offenders persons characteristics, this was popularised by the work of Lombroso9. Lombroso attempted to distinguish between different types of human individuals with miscellany of racial and biological differences. Lombroso wanted to establish a link between criminality by particular traits which correspond to various stages of human evolution. Lombroso stated that a criminal can be identified through a stigma of physiological attributes such as, low intellect, high cheekbones and large ears, pleonastic nipples, fingers or toes, an asymmetric jaw and finally t attoos, Lombroso had withal stated that these criminals behaved in a different way for example low inability in the following factors, no social and moral issues, no differentiate between right and wrong, no guilt or remorse, no feelings towards other people and no form of any alliance.10So if a criminologist would look at Lombroso factors, there would be disagreements to the issues raised by the theorist as the physiological features of a human should not be predicted or labeled when innate(p) of them physical attributes. This may amount to people being sentences do death without the need of any evidence enclosure. Furthermore people may get the physical features of what was stated by Lombroso as to accidents, which may label a person as being a criminal. So it was tested by Goring11on a group and there was no prodigious behavior but it was criticised that Goring did not have a prim control group and the criminal samples contained mostly mentally disturbed people but he also a ccepted the fact that the environment does add together to the growth of criminal behaviour.12the legal theorist basically stated that the attributes execute to murder killers, as a result the tattoos where seen has being a issue that was raised and it shows that it as a affect on murders as it provided a understanding of how society use tattoos telling how much murders they have committed and what gang culture they are from for example, the Thailand gangs tend to use tattoos as a symbol for distinguishing what gangs they are from and furthermore the gang reputation.In conclusion, after looking at the approaches of theorist and why people commit such crimes, it should be considered in real cases on whether or not punishment in the UK is effective or should consider using more fatal punishment similar to Capital punishment.Q2.Robert Mochrie was a middle class worker, whose occupation was victorious family photograph, taken when his wife Cathy was awarded a degree at Cardiff Univer sity, and also had 4 children in school. Robert Mochrie had realised that his Mrs Cathy was having other affair with another male fire named David Osborne from south Wales. He had stated that he had an intimate and sexual relationship with Mrs Mochrie. This caused the murders to result in murdering the family as it emotionally and mentally modify Mr. Mochrie to commit an unlawful act of murder.Mochrie himself, killed the whole family in a hotel, Haverford west in South Wales because he hanged himself after murdering his wife, Cathy, along with Bethan, 10, Luke, 14, Sian, 16, and James, 18, in July last year. It shows that Mr Mochrie had affected the mental view which resulted in the actus rea of the crime13.Looking at a criminologist prospective this case distinguishes that Robert Mochrie falls in the definition of a mass murder as an individual committed multiple killing one and if a theorist was to approach this scenario he or she would look at various theories to see what th e causation of the crime. A theorist would firstly look at it form the prospective of functionalism theory as it states that as a couple they should stay together and work together, it shows relating back to the scenario that the situation that Robert Mochrie was the issue of Mrs Cathy indulging with someone else whilst in the presences of Mr. Roberts. This had an affect on the mental state has it resulted in committing the brutality of the family annihilation. It shows from the theory that it should look at things in a positive way, but in relation to the scenario Mr. Robert in this case could not take the issue that had happen in a positive way as it affect the thinking of what his wife had done and the mental thinking of Mr. Robert had not been take it into account that his wife would ever sleep with another man after being married and having four children which resulted in not allowing is wife to sleep with another man and in stopping this he committed the unlawful act.Whereas looking at another killer like Roaul moat who was a serial killer, Raoul Moat, was 37-year-old man and his occupation was a tree diagram surgeon, bouncer and panel beater but it furthermore stated that Roaul Moat had injected himself with steroids which produced anger problems and had issues with old wife. He was from Newcastle upon Tyne, shot three people with a shot gun after two days after his release from shorthorn prison for previous convictions he had killed, his ex-girlfriend Samantha Stobbart, her new partner Chris Brown, and police officeholder David Rath band. Brown was killed after a man hunt was taken out in Roth bury after and the police tasered Roaul Moat which resulted in him committing self-annihilation with his shotgun.14.If a theorist was to examine Roaul Moat scenario it would be looked at the prospective of biologist as it mainly complies with the theory of Lombroso has the murderer Roaul Moat had the physical characteristics of low intellect, high cheek bones as he was a bodybuilder, who had taken steroids which resulted in him having anger management problems to influence a murder or commit a crime. Hes suitable in the call of the theory and furthermore Roaul Moat also is adequate with the functionalism theory as there was lack of positivity in Roaul Moat as a criminal record from previous shows and furthermore a previous relationship may have started the chain of causations. Having looked at what may have caused the chain of causation, it should be suggested on whether or not they should be minded(p) an imprisonment for feel or capital punishment to death.Capital punishment is a punishment to death and since ancient times it has been used for a wide class of offences. In England, only major offences carried the death penalty treason, murder, larceny, burglary, rape, and arson and it was stated in Waltham Black Acts, where it increase in the number of people being put to death each year. The statistics the peak year was 1785 with 307 people given a death penalty and furthermore in the year 1800 the world was just 9 million. The reform of death penalty was criticised in atomic number 63 1750s, by French philosopher Cesare Beccaria and the English law reformer argued that the punishment of death was needlessly cruel has it was irrelevant to crimes like rapes has refilling or other forms of method may have mentally have changed on committing unlawful crimes and looked at a more able alternative a life-time imprisonment.But some writers would state that capital punishment was a best-loved way in removing the worst criminals forever from society and helps provide a much safer place for other society users of Britain. Furthermore the dead criminals cannot commit any further crimes.Furthermore the issue that arise towards death penalty is the issue on monetary being spent on murders and the name that are raised is the UK does not have an unlimited service, furthermore the governing body is exploiting money on murder killers rather that people with bigger issues like helping old, young and other people with a illness like cancer, rather than on the long term imprisonment of murderers. Spending money for life time imprisoned murders is not seen has being a real punishment whereas an execution is seen acceptable as retribution is seen by many member states of other countries after seeing the results of the death penalty has had a deterrence on the criminal activity. Issuing a death penalty is much more likely to be a deterrent and it shall have an impact on potential criminality has time to think about the possible consequences. But when a crime is committed on a stand still there is no likelihood that any punishment will act as a deterrent.A criminologist would specify from the statistics that death penalty really affected Britain economically as a whole, as the death penalty reduced the population of Britain which affects productivity, human kind and furthermore socially but on the othe r the statistics shows when the act of parliament abolished capital punishment it had a dramatic impact on the numerical people given life on imprisonment. The official statistics show unlawful killings in Britain have more than doubled since abolition of capital punishment the figure for homicides in 2007 was 734 and 6,300 people are currently serving sentences of life in prison for murder. From the statistics it shows that life in prison does not really deter people from committing murder as the figures tend to be rising but looking at the reform act it looks at the people thrift between the family and friends taking the impact.Having Looked at the for arguments towards capital punishment for unlawful killing, some writers would state that there are validated consequences on why a state should not provide capital punishments but more rational punishment. The first issue that a writer may constitute is a person may be innocent and may be kill and there is no possible way of compe nsating them for this wrongfulness of justice. There is also another significant, a person convicted of the murder may have very killed the victim but does not admit it is a murder adulterate it then comes down to the skill of the prosecution and defence lawyers as to whether there will be a conviction for murder or for manslaughter.A second reason, that is often overlooked, is family and friends of criminals are the time leading up spiel of the execution. It is often very difficult for people to come to terms with the fact that their loved one could be guilty of a serious crime and no doubt even more difficult to come to terms with their death in this form. The family should not be affected for the crime someone else committed and should further look at the prospective of the criminals as they are real people too who have right to life and furthermore they incorporate pain, fear and the loss of their loved ones.15.Relating back to the two scenarios of the murderers it can be sta ted that Roaul Moat should be given capital punishment having killed innocent people of the public and showed no remorse as he carried his criminal activity and furthermore as Roaul moat had already served an prison sentences for previous convictions for a period of couple of years, it shows that Roaul Moat is person who is not changeable if being sent to life in imprisonment, so it would be preferable for a murder of his caliber to be sentenced to death. Looking at the mass murder Mr Mochrie it can would not be relevant to lodge a person like him to capital punishment as he had a issue of domestic and the life of imprisonment would have rehabilitation his mental stability but him getting a charge of life it could.