Difference Between Critical Analysis and Analytical Thinking

When you veryly insufficiency to reflect and put your points across, its said that you have to speak through your mind just now from your boob with what you have lived and pick upd. In this piece, I am going to use real life issues and experiences to dish out put forth my genuine reflections on the distinguishable ways of thought analytic, overcritical and strategic. To start with, I would standardized to talk of the latest and prominent issue in Mumbai, whether it should be called Mumbai or Bombay. in that respect was this debate going around in the class and one of my peers canvas that it should be called Bombay because 80% masses in Mumbai indirect request to call it by that name. Then he also corroborated this by linking it with one of the newspaper and verbal expression that it has stated that 65% of the public want to call this city Bombay and non Mumbai. He also conducted his survey and collected data of tribe from divers(a) parts of the city, the South Mu mbai, the Central Mumbai and the North Mumbai. He later canvas the question on the data collected and concluded that indeed people of this city want to call it by its colonial name Bombay.He was indeed very right because he had broken down this task and had made all effort to reach every corner of the city for the survey. His survey number too indicated the same(p) and with the help of analytic sentiment, he convinced that people want to call this city Bombay. Thus the salmon pink of analytical thinking is that with the data and figure well in located you can possibly prove anything without anyone even questioning it. However I was born in Mumbai knew this city in and out and decided to describe the answer to the same problem save critically.More than numbers and figures, I relied more(prenominal) on my knowledge and experiences of this beautiful city. Therefore, I too conducted a similar but asked one more question, Why do they want to call Mumbai as Bombay? And the answer was surprising. They wanted to call it Mumbai but as the name of Mumbai was Bombay in the business circle, they wanted it to named Bombay. Moreover, the survey conducted by my shoplifter was done in commercial areas of the South, central and North Mumbai. Where majority of the people abide by from other cities and have no knowledge and ground of the local anesthetic tactile sensations.So the analytical thinking over here clearly lose out the local feeling of the people as well as the understanding of the complex community. I have mentioned the to a higher place experience because I want to bring forth the major difference between analytical and critical thinking. While analytical thinking did prove and gave an answer to the above question and even looked more credible because of the numbers, it failed to include local feeling and knowledge of the local area. This is one of the major differences between analytical and critical thinking.While analytical thinking segregates the problem into some areas and tries to back it up with figures, critical thinking uses the knowledge and experience and put them into logical thinking to formulate an answer. As far as strategic thinking is concern, I am still trying to define the meaning and the closer I am defining it the farther it goes. Its like debating whether GOD last or not. GOD is there we believe, but on experiences and intuitions. We cannot see Him but still feel Hes there. Similarly, strategic thinking eludes its explicit existence but is always there.You can call it a invent of actions designed to achieve a particular goal. This plan of action is utilize by considering and weighing several facets and views. Your knowledge and most importantly your understanding and application is of uttermost importance for strategic thinking. After these prerequisites comes the analysis and deductive reasoning of these prerequisites keeping the importance of all practicable view and possibilities open. Hence, stra tegic thinking never has a definite answer or solution. Its all or so selecting the best possibility.So even If I do manage to come out with a winning strategy other might sarcasm it simply because they might look at it from different angle. So more you are ridiculed or castigated the better will be your strategic thinking. nowadays lead is like a soul trapped between his upcountry consciousness and external realities. The soul can choose infinite possibilities but yet have to select a very few. Moreover, whatever he does should be such that it takes the side that benefits the all. In today world, a leadership would be difficult to sustain without keeping all the three things like financial, social and environmental aspects.And to keep this leadership has to inculcate power with morals for any sort of sustainability. Leadership can be short-lived if one doesnt compromise on some of the ethics at the same time would be dangerous if he follows none. So it has t o have it only to the point of sustainability. When an enlightened one writes a verse form thousands read it. However, each one of them perceives it in a way they want to and this depends on their own life experiences and knowledge. Similarly, I use to perceive the domain in a way I have seen it with my eyes and observed. that to really understand you need to perceive it through the eyes of many others and that is one thing that I have learned from this edifying experience of the last two weeks. Today when I am leading, I am open to infinite possibilities and views. I am trying to use the quintet why technique in my mind to reach out to the possible root cause.. Then the model that I am trying to become is to use critical thinking first and then use analytical thinking to corroborate the findings of the critical thinking. This I feel would help restitution the limitations of the analytical thinking and at the same time will help foster the critical thinking results.