Management theories Essay

serious music focussing surmisal and merciful carnal knowledges scheme have played an vital place in the history of new(a) centering .It is 2 qualitative leap of modern management system. As two relatively complete system of Management theory, determinate Management theory and man relations theory has made its own curious contribution. This essay aims to identify key similarities and differences between two theory by comparing detailed aspects which including focus, the comprehension of expression ,basic assumptions of person and the task of leader, simultaneously, exploring how Classical Management theory and merciful Relations theory can conciliate the incompatibilities between the approaches.Classical Management theory was developed during the Industrial regeneration in order to deal withthe problem about inefficiency in the factories. it in general contained of Weber(1922)s Bureaucratic management,Taylor(1911)s Scientific Management and Fayol(1925)s world-wide Ma nagement Principles. As Taylor (1911) wrote in his books the purpose of scientific management is how earn the maximum efficiency ,these theory highlighted the importance of using scientific and regulate methods in lap upplace stayed out the study will continue to remedy the working methods determine the many principles to operate the organization more efficiently and emphasized the salary as a potential factor of motivation. human race Relation theory was proposed by a America behavioral scientist named mayo (1933) after that Classical Management theory had been presented for nearly 20 age . According to Meyao (1933)the nearly important factor that effected the productivity argon not condition and treatment ,but the human relation in workplace.Human Relation theory stressed the importance of human factors advocated improving passenger vehicles hide individualized skills and changing leadership emphasized the informal organizationClassical Management theory and Human Rel ations theory contain many aspects that sh ar differences and some aspects share similarities. Firstly, on focus,the classical management approach emphasized a concern for task (output).Thus, using the methods of Optimization of techniques and stark management in order to improve workers output is what the classicalmanagement theory contract on. In contrast ,the Human Relations Approach focuses on twain the workers themselves and efficiency, This aimed at increasing the work productivity through satisfaction and collaboration.second ,according to the comprehension of organisational structure .in Classical Management approach . The organizational structure should be formal and clearly. Weber (1922) wrote that an inclinationl administrative structure has characteristics which including a clear organizational division of labor a top-down hierarchy a professional management system and a unforgiving independent rules and discipline. Whereas the Human Relations Theory proposed the p erspective that there is a informal organization existed in enterprise besides formal organization.The role of this formal is to safeguard the common interests of the members so that protect the common interests from surplus loss caused by negligence of internal individual or out-of-door interference. For instance ,a group which the members are not arranged by manager but the reason of which have common values or personal interests is a informal organization.Thirdly ,on basic assumptions of person, the classical approach adopts measureize the methods of working ,as well as training of employees and they worked more like machines. thus , the staff often regarded as economic person in Classical Management theory ,this approach to a fault states that the salary is the save focussing to stimulate the enthusiasm of employees to work .While Human Relations theory proposes hardened staff as social person so that not only does it consider collaboration factor to motivate worker but also views strong worker relationship, recognition and achievement as motivators for increase productivity. Its based on the most popular Maslow(1943)s hierarchy of involve which stated that every person has some ineluctably which affects his performance and motivation. These needs in the order from the most basic are Physiological needs, caoutchouc needs, social needs, Esteem needs and Self-actualization needs. ( Maslow ,1943)Finally ,the task of leadership under classical management theory is to set the staff to set work standards, and supervise employees complete theproject efficiently .While under the Human Relations theory, the task of leader ship was to facilitate cooperation or coordination among the workers while providing service and opportunities for their personal promotion and development and was to be seen as an agent for intra and inter group communication. (Donnelly,2008)Although both two theories on the theoretical though and the approaches are totally differen t. They still contain a few similarities . For example,they both confide in organizations as closed, changeless entities which shared a common point common increased productivity ,It was the final goal either of approaches concentrate on the target that attempted to find the most efficient counseling for arranging and managing tasks.It is difficult to identify which theory is more superior, in most case .modern enterprise associate two management approach to increased productivity. How to balance it is what the leader should ponder. Therefore ,the two major theoretical eyeshot of management theory are well described by Douglas McGregors theory X and theory Y in his book named The Human Side of Enterprise Theory X relates to the classical approach that holds that tribe need, and indeed tend to be directed and controlled .In the meantime ,leaders should use strict rule and punishments to regulated workers behavior. Theory Y relates to the human relations approach, the idea that m anagements task is to create an environment where employees can be innovative and productive or satisfied in the workplace at least.For instances, In 1960s, a new mode of achievement named just in time (also named Lean Production) was implemented Toyota Automotive Corporation .JIT is good combine of two theories. it helps corporation overcome the first energy crisis .The core of JIT is induce timely and appropriately. Equalization and standard production cycle time and standard operating sequence reflect classical management, while Employees can step in in the production process and develop personal initiative. The mode of production also stressing coordination ,this factors reflect thought of Human Relations theory.In the nutshell.As two of the most significant studies in field ofmanagement,Classical Management theory and Human Relations theory have their own particular merits and limitations. the two theories should not be simply isolated, a single and combined together, but to be a relationship of organic whole. Because of diversity of modern economic environment, A good leader should be the one who can balance discordant theories and put into practice depending on different situation.which means none of management theories is superior to the other.ReferenceFayol,H (1949) General and Industrial Management.New York harpist=Taylor,F.W(1911) The Principles of Scientific Management.New York HarperDonnelly,R.(2008) The Role of the Manager. Scotland Pitman Publishing.Donnelly, R. (2000) Schools of Management Thought. Scotland Pitman Publishing.Maslow ,A. H. (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation.New YorkPsychological Review.Mayo,E.(1933) The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization.Boston HarvardUniversity Press.McGregor,D(1960) The Human Side of Enterprise .New York McGraw-HillBibliographyDavis,R.C. (1951) The fundamentals of Top Management .New York Harper